Still, Microsoft has made it so that there is no possible way to sync with OSX and it's bugging me. At least make it so we can drag and drop! They can't afford to be losing customers just because of this restriction, I mean, do they WANT their product to sell?
The Zune brand is pretty much only known by geeks, or at least bought by them, and more people in the geek community have Macs than in the "other" community...
I'm not trying to say that geeks only have Macs, just sayin'... you get what I mean..
I think for some reason they just have a pride issue with it. I am hoping that they will finally break the mold when the Zune HD is released in September. That would be an ideal situation for them, new player with fantastic capabilities and Mac support. They could actually gain a little bit more market share that way I think.
I think the other issue is the Zune software. how do you port that over to the Mac and still give it that Zune look? I bet they are struggling with that at least a little bit. I wish they would use the native APIs for Mac AND Windows though. I, for one, am sick of proprietary window borders and file menus. Making a program look native should be part of a developer's job.
I'm not sure this assertion is true. Most Mac users I know are more influenced by media and not specs, and they generally are not interested in truly exploiting their gadgets to the fullest potential. For instance, rarely do I see a Mac which has anything but the default desktop wallpaper. Geeks, as far as I'm concerned, are the consumers who truly want to use (and abuse) technology and have full control over their experience. That's not something you'll get from Apple. It may be true that a large percentage of "geeks" have macs, but the general consumer movement is rapidly moving toward Apple products while geeks still demand the ability to customize and control.
But back to the topic at hand, I don't think that Microsoft is as concerned with supporting a small fraction of the computer market (almost all of which is already taken by the iPod) when they have the problems of international support, music and video licensing, and of course developing and marketing products to attend to. Microsoft is spread thin with all of the myriad of services it provides, so I would think they prioritize.
I think Mac OSX support might come over the years, but for now it just isn't a priority for Microsoft. The fact that the Zune OS got his (visible) clock only on the third version shows us the Zune Team whatever it finds most important first. From the moment they've brought Zune to it to its full potential they'll start thinking of things like Mac support.
It's logical that when Windows controls the biggest part, around 90 percent, of the market, Microsoft first wants to be sure that Zune is a success before it starts porting their software to Mac.
While what you're saying is true, that Mac users can run Windows via Bootcamp, I don't want to have my music collection twice on the same hard drive. I'd have to do this because Windows can't read the other partition (OS X)
I dont know if anyone has already said this before(i dont think i am going to read 3 pages worth of threads) but the reason that Microsoft does not have mac support for mac is because of lack of DRM support. All version of Windows from XP and above have a very tight layer of DRM management that Zune Pass can tap into to make sure that their content is not being pirated. Mac does not have that kind of DRM management that is available for Microsoft to tap into and they dont want to release a player that does not work with on another platform and i agree with decision to go along with Windows only (though i am a mac user), but on the other hand it would really open up a whole new market to them.
Frankly I have become a bit tired of iPods(i am running on my 3rd one, currently iPod Touch), for they have become a bit too generic. Every tom dick and harry has one and i think this is a growing feeling in the geek community that there is some competition needed in the mp3 player business. Sandisk/Cowon/Creative i would hardly call competition for their players simple do not lack the finesse that a Zune or iPod have atleast not on the software based sync side.
The DRM required by the Zune would appear to be tied to Windows. DRM is required because of contractural obligations to the music companies to allow their content to be offered via subscription, and provide a means to revoke the rights if necessary. I've had one album "pulled" for some reason, not sure why.
As for drag-and-drop, I find it fine for smaller capacity players, like 1 or 2 GB, but with about 70GB (and more every day) of content, I find the Zune software is the way to go. It allows access to new music, which is automatically sync'ed with the device without a second thought. CDs are ripped and sync'ed in one operation as well.
Yes, they could have done things different, but then it wouldn't be as good.
I can tell you right now, I think the Zune (Even the current Zune) is FAR better than any iPod. Wireless Syncing, Social Network/Song Sharing, SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE (Cough APPLE). Not to mention the Zune Desktop software blows iTunes out of the water... The only reason I no longer have one is because I run a Mac.
If Microsoft released a Mac software with similar features (Wifi Sync, and Subscription) I would buy a Zune tomorrow.
Yeah i feel the same way. I played around with the Zune software on my windows partition on my macbook. The software is really impressive. The only reason I haven't gone out and bought a Zune over an iPod is because I bought too much iTunes content sugar coated in DRM.
I don't think they plan on porting over the zune. I'd make a safe assumption that most mac owners would rather own an iPod or iPhone. Of course there are exceptions to that rule, I'm sure there a few mac people who would want a zune. That combined with the fact that the mac has a small marketshare (although it is growing), it wouldn't be a good move for them to develop for the mac. Not worth the development time and resources.
i thought the target audience for Zunes were people who wanted something on par with an iPod but didn't want to support Apple (that's me).
chinster is right... the people who would go out of their way to actively switch to an Apple are the same people who would not bother deviating from the iPod / iPhone / iWhatever. Apple had to market to PCs to crack the market there because there are so many PC users. Microsoft doesn't really need to pander to the Mac crowd because the number of people who would primarily use an Apple but would rather eschew the iPod for a Zune can be counted on 0 fingers.
Your generalization that those who own Macs aren't interested in exploiting their gadgets to their full potential, and that they never change their wallpaper from the default is obtuse and frankly undeserved. There are advanced Mac users just like there are advanced windows users. There are those who just use Internet Explorer or don't change from the default wallpaper on both sides.
I would have got a Zune when it was first released if it had had Mac support, and it kinda seems stupid that it doesn't, I mean, I have no idea how it works but Apple seem to have no trouble supporting both Windows and OSX, so in my eyes the Zune should do the same. I don't particularly want to have to reset my iMac and boot into Windows just to sync my Zune, and it is because of this and the easy integration of the iPod/iPhone with my OSX system (and with Windows) that I wouldn't buy a Zune over an iPod.
Here's hoping the Zune HD breaks the mould and supports OSX.
I agree. I have a MacBook, but I've really liked the look of the Zune the past couple of generations, and the Zune HD looks even better. I would almost certainly pick one up if they added Mac support.
iPod didn't have Windows support until the second generation hardware, and they didn't have support worth a damn (iTunes for Windows) until the third generation. The difference, of course, was that it was impossible for iPod to gain a significant market share without Windows support, so it was an extremely high priority for them.
I'm pretty confident that the Zune team has Mac support in their roadmap somewhere, but there are so many other things that are more important to get to first like international licensing deals and getting the Zune HD ready for prime time.
Apple has to support The IPodIPhone on Windows because not enough people use Macs and they know it.
The majority of the world uses windows. It’s a fact. Microsoft doesn’t need to worry about the .05% of users who have a MAC and want a Zune. If you want a Zune get a real computer :).
I think that's more about it being released in 2001, when nothing was really compatible with everything, 8 years later, people expect to be able to plug their gadgets into their computer and for it to work, regardless.
They probably won't ever add support, it would give Apple another box to check off on OSX's list of features. Apple had to support Windows simply because it has larger market share and quite frankly, Apple aren't in a strong enough position to warrant that support yet
To those saying MS has 90% of the market share: While it may be true for the OS but it certainly isn't for MP3 players, and that's what we're talking about here. To break Apple's hold on the portable music sector, MS needs to make their players available for use on OS X. They HAVE to, no ifs ands or buts about it.
No, they don't. If the Zune only worked with an OS that had 4% market share then they would have to open it up to another OS in order to succeed. Since it works with an OS that has 90% of the market they do not need to make the device work with any other system. Deal with it.
not being a mac guy, it seems to me that direct support to osx works against where ms is going right now.
being a kinda geeky guy, if i had a mac and wasn't running bootcamp to do windows only stuff, i would be falling down on my geekly duty.
and considering what i hear about itunes on windows from a few of my buddies, i think ms will have to do some super development work so mac users won't hate them. getting it right needs to be more important that getting it out.
It would be cool if they did though. I don't like DRM, but if they were to make Zune Marketplace available for Mac it could be a real competitor for iTunes in the Apple world. I've always liked the Zune, but I refuse to go back to Windows just for an MP3 player that offers little advantage for me.
I don't think MS finds it to be a viable option yet. they don't want to spend time and money developing for a platform that they dont think will have that many zuners on it. I think they want to focus on perfecting the zune from the PC side and gaining more market share before moving to OSX.
Seems XNJB works for Zune. From what I saw when i (briefly) skimmed through comments, there were issues in the past (to do with firmware updates and the like) but it looks like it works atm for transferring data.
Why no Mac support? That's cuz Macs suck!!!
No no no seriously tho. What about iTunes and ipods? Why are "they" so incompatible?!
So in conclusion... Dont blame the Microsoft product, blame the Mac
This is a huge Mistake for Microsoft and Zune will not increase market share until they support Macs. Forget about Mac OS X Market share and think about its mind share. Anyone that goes to a Mall knows about Macs and a lot have thought about getting one. I imagine that a lot of Zunes have not sold after the potential buyer found out about the "Windows only" restriction. Maybe you use Windows now (I do), but do you want to tie a music player to your OS decision?
All the reasons for Microsoft not to support Macs smack of incompetence. They can't do software? They can't do DRM on the Mac? They are afraid to compete? Come on! Microsoft has the money and the talent to do anything if they really want it. So, my conclusion is they don't want to do it, and the reason they don't want to do it is that they are stuck in a protect Windows mentality. But nothing is threatening Windows! It's just corporate paranoia and it's hurting Microsoft. Other projects (including search, Xbox, etc) are affected by this mind set, but none more than the Zune. Come on Microsoft, grow a pair... Compete and win.
Fact. Apple has more PC Itunes uses then Mac Itunes users.
Fact. Most computers run windows.
Fact. More users use Linux then Mac OSX.
So the next largest market would be the Linux users. Not Mac OSX.
I'm betting they'll have it eventually, as soon as they feel like it's holding back their sales by any significant margin. Bottom line is, they've got their hands full trying to make the Zune successful and if you only have time to support one platform, Windows is the correct choice. Contrary to popular belief, Microsoft doesn't have unlimited money to throw into the development of this thing, and they have to use their budget wisely to avoid the Zune line failing before it can get some momentum in the marketplace. Once they attain that, they can work on expanding their platform support.
But... why? I don't know any self respecting Mac owners (well, outside of this thread ;) that want a Zune. Mac guys I know have iPhones and don't need an MP3 player.
true, but they should still offer the support instead of ignoring the platform. I believe the Zune application on Windows is built with Adobe Air, so it should be easy to transfer it over from Windows to Mac, without having to entirely rewrite the code.
Nah, the Zune app is written in .NET with either C++ or C#. You can actually read the source if you download an app called .NET Reflector and point it at Zune.exe. The interesting this is they didn't use an existing UI framework like Windows Forms or WPF, they built a custom framework called Iris www.istartedsomething.com/20071116/microsoft-iris-... . That framework itself is built on DirectX 9. Since neither .NET or DirectX exist on Mac it'd definitely take some work to port the software. Maybe they could use Mono on Mac and make it a bit easier to port - it would be nice to have options.
I'm not sure what makes you think more geeks run Mac instead of Windows. You can't even legitimately build your own Mac, and even if you pirate the OS, Mac is compatible with VERY little hardware out there. If you want to build your own power house desktop, without spending $10,000, you won't be doing it with OS X in mind.
Geeks build PCs. Poor geeks buy netbooks. (AA1, here) Geeks buy Windows Mobile and Android phones and reinstall each individual service on the phone with 3rd party software that best suits their needs. Geeks backup their data, format their OS drive, and reinstall Windows on a regular basis to keep the hard drive clear of fragmentation and useless junk while keeping everything running at top speeds. We also do that with our Windows Mobile phones on a weekly / monthly basis. Not becuase we have to, but because we want to.
IMO, geeks would have to make too many compromises to convert to Mac. OS X is just that little project they install on their netbooks, because it's cool.
With regards to why Zune is not Mac compatible, I assume MS knows most Mac owners run Windows on Parallels or Boot Camp. The number of Mac owners running OS X exclusively that want a Microsoft made Zune is probably incredibly small.
Microsoft cant spend the time or money supporting mac??? Thats a joke. Microsoft's Zune brand has minuscule market share compared to the ipod, they need to make their product available to as many people as possible. Ignoring OSX and Linux is foolish. Attacking a mountain from only one side is a task left for the stubborn and blind. I guarantee there are mac users(including myself) who would by a zune if it was supported in OSX. Considering how few Zunes are sold it really couldn't hurt. It is not a huge undertaking to make the Zune MSC or create a very basic media transferring program that works with OSX. They definitely have the time/manpower and they certainly have the money.
Microsoft cant afford to make the Zune OSX compatible??? Hah! What Microsft cant afford is to ignore potential adopters, even if they are a smaller demographic.
I have a Zune.. and I don't think they need to worry about MAC support. They have some things to fix on the Windows end. And lets face it, this is a Microsoft product.. it benifits them to sell within their own ecosystem just like MAC does. Would it maybe give Zunes more customers, eh maybe like 10 but are you really going to buy a Zune HD when your Mac Book comes with an Ipod Touch for Free?
MAC should be happy MS supports it. I don't think the explosion would have happened if MS did not port Office to the MAC. In college you can't even get some classes without having Excel or PowerPoint.. they typically do not support the MAC versions..
I love Microsoft but this is a slap in the face only to the customers. Apply probably loves this because it will make some people on the fence who might have bought a Zune jump to Apple who supports Windows and Mac (and Linux, etc.). This is a stubborn business decision they made, and sad to see they did it!
I think he was just saying that most non-geeks are more comfortable with Windows because it's more widely used. Macs are still somewhat a niche market, though they are gaining.
And yes, it does seem like most of my non-geek friends are opposed to buying a Mac because it's "hard to use." I think it's most likely because they're used to Windows, regardless of the usability of each OS.
I'm surprised at how many people want Mac support. At first I didn't think it was worth the trouble, but seeing how many Mac users here would consider a Zune if it supported Macs, now I'm not so sure. They could at least add drag and drop support for all the Mac and Linux users.
Yeah I think I've changed my mind... maybe MS does need to consider Mac support. Who would have thought that would be an issue - i guess its a good problem to have!
Come on, only enough time to support one platform. That is just not true and if it is then Microsoft is just being stupid and narrow minded. If they want a shot at really making the Zune a popular product they are just going to have to support the Mac, now more than ever.
And before someone cries Fanboy, I was a diehard Windows user since Windows 3.0 and only in the past 2 years have I become an Apple convert.
I don't even have such high hopes for explicit OSX support. I got a Macbook last year and was bummed to find out that everything worked with it except my Zune 80, and I haven't been able to run it successfully through Parallels either (although I've seen people who have apparently succeeded). It's frustrating to say the least. At least make it a little less fussy so it's easier to somehow figure out a way to use it without a PC!
I also have an ipod touch but it's just not quite the same. I really do like the Zune a lot.
Could it be possibly that Microsoft wants to make sure that they get everything in the Zune working perfectly before they open it up to other systems? Remember the iPod only worked with Macs in the first generation of the product. Once all of the bugs were worked out, Apple then opened it up to PCs with the HP iPod.
Microsoft should be more interested in selling the Zune outside of the US, though Apple has made a dent (10%) in PC sales here, they are very small on the world stage (4%).
A lot of you guys are missing the point. Microsoft has purposely made it so that you cannot, in ANY way, sync with a Mac. Even if they didn't make the Zune software for the Mac (or any other OS for that matter), they still could have made it so we can drag and drop.
I really think that the zune software is much better than iTunes. However, I am a mac person and I will be switching to the zune software (not so much the hardware) to manage my music.
no can do, sorry. they'd loose control over their users, that's why Apple, MS and all the other DRM/Control freaks use their proprietary systems in the first place. and that's why i don't buy it. alternatives sporting far superior sound and audio quality are plenty.
and don't think for a minute, they wouldn't pull off such a nasty stunt as Amazon did last week if it pleases them.
They sort of already do. I had an album downloaded via subscription, and for some reason the rights changed and I could no longer play it. Zune Marketplace now says that album is "not available". Theoretically they could do the same thing with purchased content managed by the Zune software.
Did it ever occur to anyone that it isn't Microsoft who is holding up mac support but Apple? Apple has always been the proprietary "can't use anything unless it's Apple branded" company -- maybe they're stopping Microsoft from letting developers create Zune software for OS X.
This seems to be very likely to me. Why would Apple allow support on their platform for the ONLY pmp out there that is a formidable opponent to their iPod (spec-wise)? My guess is that Microsoft is just as eager as the rest of us for mac support.
I'm a pc user myself (and a customized zune 80 owner) but I would LOVE to see mac compatible zune software. It's the only way for Zune to have a chance in making a dent in the iPod marketshare. Yet for some reason it just seems unlikely. We can only hope.
Sure Microsoft could develop the software but there are plenty of ways for Apple to prevent it from running on a mac. Mac prohibits OS X from being installed on anything but a Mac, they prohibit any kind of 3rd party hardware from being used with any Apple products, what makes you think this is so different? Killing Zune software could be as easy as pushing a mandatory update...just like the killed Palm Pre's compatibility with iTunes.
I think it's silly to think that Microsoft is being stubborn or that they're too proud. Pride doesn't exist in the business world. If they can make more money from something they're going to do it. So either developing software for macs won't make them a significant enough amount of money (probably not true) or something is preventing them from doing so....or maybe they just haven't gotten around to it, which is perfectly reasonable.
Yeah but Apple allows people to make apps for OS X.
iTunes was only made for Apple products, and imagine the uproar of the tech community if they restricted the use of an app on OS X. The Pre and iTunes situation is actually understandable.
Yeah they allow "people" to make apps for OS X but why would they allow the biggest threat to their PMP out there to make software compatible with their operating system? The Zune HD is technically superior to the touch, even though it may not be out yet. It's not going to take out the iPod but it has the potential to take significant chunk of the marketshare. Point is, the "people" they let make apps aren't as much of a threat (in most cases not a threat at all) as microsoft is.
makes sense to me.
But at the same time, Apple almost always comes out with a refreshed iPod line every fall. My guess is they'll top the HD almost instantly. Won't stop me from buying it though...I'm in it for the software.
In any case, as much as I'm defending this prospect, I still think the most plausible reason for lack of Zune software for OS X is simply that Microsoft hasn't gotten around to it. Microsoft has a history of taking FOREVER to do things. It's probably just not high priority for them...as much as we want it to be. We can only hope to see OS X support when the HD comes out. I'm looking forward to upgraded software for PC...it could use some whippy snappiness.
Apple wouldn't prevent it from running on the mac. It's just software. If Apple killed software from people they didn't like, you wouldn't get jailbreaking software, you wouldn't get Firefox, you wouldn't have anything competing with their own stuff. They just can't do that.
I'm sure Microsoft's analysts can say that having Mac support for their software just isn't profitable enough. Kingblind said it right I think.
Apple does own this market, unfortunately, and they probably will for a long time. The best we can hope for is Zune taking maybe 15-30% of the marketshare.
there you are. i suppose, Amazon only made waves because of all books they chose George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four to demonstrate their 'Big Brother' powers :)
well, as long folks are willing to spend big bucks for the privilege to have their gadgets 'killswitched', manufacturers will continue selling them.
You're posting this here too? We're talking about mac support. Again, Amazon didn't do it to flex their power. But the real issue is why doesn't MS have Mac Zune software? It seems silly to me to ignore that part of the market. I know a lot of mac users who would buy a Zune if their computers could run the software.