Question about
adcustom

Why in the WORLD did Nintendo not make the bottom screen capacitive?

Was it just for backwards compatibility? it drives me friggin crazy. I feel like I'm living in the 90s when I have to pull out the stylus.
top answers
adcustom's pick
Dpmt

I think that part of it is indeed backwards compatibility. Most DS games don't need a stylus but its been there for every iteration.

Cost is also probably part, those sub-$50 smartphones are subsidized. The cheapish I've seen unsubsidized is still about $200 with a big part of that being the screen.

It also might be cultural. Capacitive touchscreen phones are all the rage in japan like elsewhere, but it it might be easier to write Japanese on a resistive touchscreen for chat or games.
mark as good answer

3 people like this answer

Clicking the mark as good answer button helps us highlight the best answers.

community pick
cass

My guess is the cost

Since the screen is small, games typically have smaller touch targets and are better to hit with a stylus. Resistive touchscreens work fine with styluses (styli?) AND are cheaper than capacitive touchscreens. It's a good way to lessen the cost to produce...though I'm not sure if they passed on the savings to the consumer.
mark as good answer

2 people like this answer

sort by

5 more answers
kris

It can't be backwards compatibility, since the touchscreens on older DS systems don't need a stylus.

I wonder if they're worried that grime transferred from your hands to the touchscreen might then get transferred to the 3D screen when you close the unit, hampering the 3D experience when you play. Unlikely, since the two shouldn't even touch when the 3DS is closed, but certainly a possibility.
mark as good answer

1 person likes this answer

timchoi89

I think it could be the cost and possibly accuracy. From what I've experienced, a capacitive screen is usually less accurate because it's more suited for finger input. If you use a capacitive stylus it might not help much because you'll need a soft tip which is usually much thicker than a fine point on a resistive stylus. With a thicker tip, it makes for harder precise movements (like writing letters).
mark as good answer

1 person likes this answer

adcustom

Maybe. But how much cheeper can they be? There are tons of sub-$50 smartphones on the market with decent capacitive screens.
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

bananaoomarang

Cost? Stylus works better than fingers for some things (don't shoot me!) and resistive works better with stylus (styli?)... Plus backwards compatibility, yeah.
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

cheezr

keep in mind that Nintendo is a company that doesn't support DVD playback on the wii because they dont want to pay the licensing fee (which cant be very much if you can get DVD players for $49 at costco).
The benefits of capacitative touch did not outway the cost savings of resistive.
Why are the cameras on the 3DS still only vga, i am sure same reason.
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

share:

7 users following this question:

  • cheezr
  • cass
  • adcustom
  • kris
  • bananaoomarang
  • timchoi89
  • Dpmt

This question has been viewed 309 times.
Last activity .