Why in the WORLD did Nintendo not make the bottom screen capacitive?
Cost is also probably part, those sub-$50 smartphones are subsidized. The cheapish I've seen unsubsidized is still about $200 with a big part of that being the screen.
It also might be cultural. Capacitive touchscreen phones are all the rage in japan like elsewhere, but it it might be easier to write Japanese on a resistive touchscreen for chat or games.
3 people like this answer
Clicking the mark as good answer button helps us highlight the best answers.
Since the screen is small, games typically have smaller touch targets and are better to hit with a stylus. Resistive touchscreens work fine with styluses (styli?) AND are cheaper than capacitive touchscreens. It's a good way to lessen the cost to produce...though I'm not sure if they passed on the savings to the consumer.
2 people like this answer
I wonder if they're worried that grime transferred from your hands to the touchscreen might then get transferred to the 3D screen when you close the unit, hampering the 3D experience when you play. Unlikely, since the two shouldn't even touch when the 3DS is closed, but certainly a possibility.
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
0 people like this answer
0 people like this answer
The benefits of capacitative touch did not outway the cost savings of resistive.
Why are the cameras on the 3DS still only vga, i am sure same reason.
0 people like this answer
share:
Products mentioned
7 users following this question:
This question has been viewed 309 times.
Last activity .