Question about
PhilLee

What's the best SSD to put in a mid-2009 MacBook Pro?

Following on from my question about upgrading my MacBook Pro to a 2011 model, I now want to see what peoples thoughts are on the best SSD to use in a mid-2009 2.53GHz MacBook Pro with 8GB of RAM. There seems to be be a lot of conflicting info on the net so I thought I'd ask here.
top answers
PhilLee's pick
ArmpitOfDeath

As with Shlub, what I'm / was running on my 2009-> MBP's were the Vertex 2's and also the Intel X25-M's. (Actually, those are the SSD's I've been buying until recently for all of my aftermarket SSD requirements)

I prefer the Vertex 2 by a slight margin based on price / performance, but for uses where I want maximum reliability and zero hassle, I chose the Intel.

I have some of the new Intel 320's on order to upgrade some laptops I've inherited / dug up and will be using. Nothing to say about those yet, but based on reviews floating around I'd say this seems like a more solid alternative to both the X25 and the V2.

I wouldn't bother going with SATA3 drives - no point.
mark as good answer

7 people like this answer

Clicking the mark as good answer button helps us highlight the best answers.

community pick
parishreop

I have used both Vertex 2s & Intel X25s in the past and can second other's high opinions of them here, but if you're looking for a really easy to implement all-in-one upgrade "kit" so to speak with a drive in the same class, I'd recommend OWC's Mercury Extreme Pro SSDs (eshop.macsales.com­/shop­/internal­_storage­/Mercury­_E...) and particularly their bundles including an SSD and their Data Doubler mounting bracket, allowing you to replace your optical drive with the SSD and thus retain your spindle drive. You didn't indicate whether you're looking to replace your MBP spin drive or augment it, but if you don't often need your optical drive, augmenting can be a great solution. It gives you the best of both worlds - size and speed - and allows you to get away with a smaller, cheaper SSD than you might otherwise be able to. I've used exclusively 64gb-class SSDs to upgrade my MBPs and never had space issues (by which I mean keeping the SSD loaded at no greater than 66% for a variety of performance & reliability concerns). The Data Doubler kit is $75 purchased alone for use with your 2.5-inch SSD of choice, but much cheaper when bundled with an OWC drive. See the 60gb example here: eshop.macsales.com­/item­/OWC­/DDMBSSD060/
mark as good answer

2 people like this answer

sort by

6 more answers
Shlub

OCZ Vertex 2
mark as good answer

2 people like this answer

Thanegill

You want the Vertex 3, it's much faster than the Vertex 2 ( 500Mb/s vs 250Mb/s). But you might want to wait until later this year or early next year. As the price for SSD are going to drop.

www.newegg.com­/Product­/Product.aspx­?Item­=N82E16820...
mark as good answer

2 people like this answer

ArmpitOfDeath

I suppose the only possible reason for going with a SATA3 drive is if you intend to move the SSD at a later juncture.
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

ryantc

Honestly, once you put in any modern SSD unless you do a lot of constant data reads or writes, you won't notice the difference in read/write rates as much as you will seek times. I'd go for the new Intel 320 series SSDs especially since they just upped their warranty to 5 years a few days ago. www.anandtech.com­/show­/4244­/intel­-ssd­-320­-review
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

PhilLee

As a follow up, I put a 240GB Vertex 2 in 10 days ago. It took some work to reduce the data on my internal disk but has made a world of difference to system performance. The MacBook now boots completely in less than 15 seconds. Aperture, Photoshop and Hype all load instantly. Can' wait for Lion and trim support.
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

MacOff

Phil, reading a year-old post of yours. A couple of Q's please. Is your computer a Mid 2009 Macbook Pro (5,3)? And if so, was the Vertex 2 any problem to get up and running, or are their any problems with throughput?

I had a conversation with OCZ today, and they recommended staying with the Vertex Plus series (their slowest ones), insisting that their higher speed SSDs can cause problems trying to cram so much data through the relatively slow SATA pipe in the MBP. It's really a 1.5 gb/sec pipe, but via Apple firmware update it's 3.0. OCZ says they've had issues.

Just wondering your experiences.

Thanks.
mark as good answer

0 people like this answer

share:

12 users following this question, including:

  • ryantc
  • mayhem
  • fyeahgreg
  • dchiuten
  • al55es
  • PhilLee
  • Shlub
  • ArmpitOfDeath
  • parishreop
  • Thanegill

This question has been viewed 24164 times.
Last activity .