TouchPad owners: How are you reacting to the news?
How shocked and/or pissed are all the TouchPad owners out there? I was kind of looking forward to giving the Pre 3 a test drive, guess that won't be happening now.
It's a fantastic mobile platform with a lot of potential that was consistently spoiled by shoddy hardware design, terrible marketing, and bad launch execution. And that's a damn shame, because I think it had the best chance out of anyone at giving Apple some honest competition.
With the negative reviews and buzz surrounding webOS devices over the years, it seems people have dismissed the whole platform as a tech failure. But for all of its shortcomings, it's easy to gloss over just how many things webOS got right, things that iOS and Android are still trying to catch up on — the intuitive multitasking interface, the notifications system, the use of gestures, connecting to all of your accounts in the cloud and never having to plug in to sync — there's a lot to like about it.
As a Mac, iPhone, and iPad owner, I'm well entrenched in Apple's ecosystem and I admire their design philosophy. But for all of the polish that iOS has, there are lots of things in webOS that are just so much better, even to this day. I have the iOS 5 beta running on my iPhone, and Apple's new notification system is still terrible and intrusive. Go ahead and laugh, Apple fanboys, but I like using my TouchPad more than my iPad. Multitasking is fluid and intuitive on webOS, and it really shines on the tablet form factor. I like never having to plug it in to charge, and being able to dock it in landscape. Even the little things, like having a number row on the virtual keyboard, and being able to resize the keyboard to fit my hands. Or Flash support — do I want to see Adobe Flash die? Absolutely, but I like that I can load up Hulu in the TouchPad's browser and stream The Daily Show for free, smoothly, without issue.
So yes, I'm disappointed that TouchPad software updates will inevitably come to a halt. But mostly I'm disappointed that consumers now have even fewer choices, and that a fledgling platform with so much potential has once again been mismanaged.
24 people like this answer
Clicking the mark as good answer button helps us highlight the best answers.
10 people like this answer
8 people like this answer
I am going to be really intrigued to see what they do with the software going forward. I guess it really will be relegated to the "HP printer OS" after all. I suppose it is possible that they are selling the software and can't sat anything about it until the products using it hit shelves (Amazon tablet, perhaps?). That might make more sense than hanging onto it at this point.
I am sorry for those who invested in this platform, at least you will have a unique collector's item in the future... much like those of us still running Psion devices.
7 people like this answer
What does disappoint me is the fact that WebOS had real promise. The ideas that had been shared with the public such as touch-to-share and how well integrated WebOS devices would be really appealed to me. WebOS seemed to be poised to create a great eco-system.
The possible upside of this is that WebOS could be licensed to other manufacturers. While this could lead to an Android like fragmentation issue, it would be nice to see WebOS on proper hardware.
4 people like this answer
If you look at Best Buy's sales figures (www.bgr.com/2011/08/17/hp-touchpad-a-dud-at-best-b...) they had less than 10% sell-through rate which just goes to show that there were honestly hardly any of these sold.
However, obviously some were sold, so what do those people do? According to MacRumors, they are (for the meantime) only discontinuing their hardware services - and will continue to support the software for an indefinite amount of time (www.macrumors.com/2011/08/18/hp-to-spin-off-pc-bus...).
In the end, I have to imagine that the people who went out and bought a TouchPad knew what they were getting into, but if they didn't, I definitely believe they have the right to be a little outraged over this whole kerfuffle.
3 people like this answer
WebOS is great concept with poor execution. Hopefully the WebOS division will be able to focus on software now.
3 people like this answer
3 people like this answer
What of the webOS itself as a software platform? I'm hoping that HP keeps and maintains developers and the app store. Killing that off will surely kill the entire platform overnight, with people tossing their phones and tablets into the river.
It's sad that two companies f'd up a totally usable OS for phones and tablets. It's got potential, but this blow to the entire platform with today's announcement is not going to help any webOS momentum Palm and HP have built.
Guess we will see if they pass the hardware off to others/licensees or if they just simply kill them off. I was very much looking forward to upgrading my aging Pre to a Pre3, but guess that's up in the air now.
Since their merger with Compaq years ago, HP hasn't been the best managed company. I miss the early 90's when they made the HP 95LX and they had a loyal following and made good on their products. Their PC line is still pretty good today, but cheaper parts lead to more breakdowns, at least that's what I've experienced as my day time gig as a Network Admin.
This may just make the entire webOS community bond together more.
3 people like this answer
2 people like this answer
As a Palm/Handspring former user, I was exited by the Palm Pré. But it came too late in CDMA (I live in France so no GSM = NOGO). By the time it was released in the US, Apple announced the iPhone 3GS. Which I bought it on the release date.
Then came the Touchpad / Pré 3 announcement.... HP used the same crappy too early announcement. You blew it once again.
2 people like this answer
But, the "Palm group" has little but itself to blame. While riding the edge of viability, always a little too late with too little, they compounded their delays by needlessly revamping the webOS SDK (software development kit) with the introduction of their TouchPad, dumping their prior, well designed SDK. Not only does this frustrate 3rd party developers that are instrumental in building their ecosystem, it sends a message that there is a lack of consistent vision for the webOS platform.
It is sad that HP didn't have the fortitude to stick with Palm a bit longer, but I am not sure that I can blame them, entirely.
2 people like this answer
That said, I am disappointed that HP is discontinuing the webOS devices so soon, and perhaps I'm being super-naive, but I wonder if they are doing this to try to capitalize on the Google-Motorola Mobility sale. Been hearing lots of news saying Google's Android partners are feeling incredibly slighted by this turn of events, and HP might want to license webOS to one or more of these partners (many think HTC). HP can't do it right if HP is still making webOS devices themselves.
2 people like this answer
I understand the business of this but it is severely depressing when HP off the bat bragged about their scale, couldn't release any desirable products.
2 people like this answer
2 people like this answer
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
1 person likes this answer
Had they just left Palm alone, maybe something interesting would have come of it. Maybe if one of those other 'secret bidders' that John Rubenstein mentioned would have taken Palm, they'd be in a better place. Damn shame it had to end like this.
1 person likes this answer
I love WebOS, I always have. I wanted HP to *take* it somewhere. This news tells me they don't care, they don't want to, they're giving up.
I'm listening to the earnings call now. I'm not liking what I hear. I'm pissed. I'm sad. I'm almost distraught.
WebOS had serious potential, it's 100x better than Android (and iOS in my opinion).
They complain because the TouchPad wasn't selling after the cut. They cut it one week ago. Are you telling me they decided to do this less than a week ago? This is insane and crazy and horrible.
1 person likes this answer
0 people like this answer
This is like Microsoft cancelling the ZuneHD early; regardless of the quality of the product or experience, the marketing sucked, no one bought it and it wasn't really successful.
Anyone want to tell me why a person would have a favorable opinion towards Palm? Making an OS that's awesome on subpar products is akin to learning Latin in today's world. It's a waste except for a very small niche.
I don't think everyone should own the same phone, but fragmentation makes sure that some people are losers, and Palm has lost over and over again. HP buying them made some sense thinking that HP was getting into the smartphone market, but Apple owns tablets. Competing with the iPad is like competing with the Yankees, you'll win some games/markets, but you're always at the disadvantage because of name recognition and marketing. The only way to ship these are if they drop the price to something ridiculous like $100.
0 people like this answer
0 people like this answer
share:
Related questions
44 users following this question:
This question has been viewed 529 times.
Last activity .
Tips for giving the best answers
Sometimes it's just little details that separates a great and not so great answer! Here are a few simple tips to keep in mind:
- 1
- Be complete and thorough. Don't skimp on the details!
- 2
- Try not to answer with a question. Because that's not really an answer, right?
- 3
- A little research goes a long way. Back up your claims and assumptions!
- 4
- Try to be patient, tech questions can be complicated.
- 5
- You are awesome for both reading this and answering questions.






