They both use an A-GPS chip, which allegedly provide sub 10-meter accuracy, but it's been hard to find anything definitive.
Also, does accuracy significantly decrease without a cellular connection? I know I've still gotten GPS location data without a cellular signal, but it seems like it takes the A-GPS chip much longer to acquire a solid lock.
Question about
Anyone have solid specs on GPS accuracy with iPhone and the iPad?
top answers
dave's pick
As I understand Assisted GPS it has two major benefits.
1) Faster time to first lock
2) Fills in missing satellite data with 'good enough' data when you are areas with dodgy GPS reception (not enough sats or urban canyons or whatever)
Neither of these affect the accuracy, just provide you with a faster and more consistent 'good enough' experience. If you lost cellular coverage your device will lose lock rather than just be less accurate about its lock when the coverage of sats gets marginal.
I have however seen a few cheap devices claiming they have aGPS when they have no actual GPS receiver. They are getting location directly from cell tower information only, and these won't work outside of cellular coverage. I always feel this is borderline lying about the specs, like people claiming that sub 100mbps services are 4G, and I don't know if the iPad falls into this category. I doubt it does. Without cellular coverage you won't have any background maps in the standard maps application, so you would need another app running for GPS lock outside coverage to be useful.
To get more than 10m accuracy you have to move to some sort of differential GPS system using two GPSs (or a correction service) as the 10m error is deliberately added to the system by the US Military to mess with hostiles using it.
TL:DR Without coverage AGPS will take longer to lock, and lose lock more often in bad conditions, but will be just as accurate when it has lock.
1) Faster time to first lock
2) Fills in missing satellite data with 'good enough' data when you are areas with dodgy GPS reception (not enough sats or urban canyons or whatever)
Neither of these affect the accuracy, just provide you with a faster and more consistent 'good enough' experience. If you lost cellular coverage your device will lose lock rather than just be less accurate about its lock when the coverage of sats gets marginal.
I have however seen a few cheap devices claiming they have aGPS when they have no actual GPS receiver. They are getting location directly from cell tower information only, and these won't work outside of cellular coverage. I always feel this is borderline lying about the specs, like people claiming that sub 100mbps services are 4G, and I don't know if the iPad falls into this category. I doubt it does. Without cellular coverage you won't have any background maps in the standard maps application, so you would need another app running for GPS lock outside coverage to be useful.
To get more than 10m accuracy you have to move to some sort of differential GPS system using two GPSs (or a correction service) as the 10m error is deliberately added to the system by the US Military to mess with hostiles using it.
TL:DR Without coverage AGPS will take longer to lock, and lose lock more often in bad conditions, but will be just as accurate when it has lock.
mark as good answer
3 people like this answer
Clicking the mark as good answer button helps us highlight the best answers.
follow this question
share:
Related questions
3 users following this question:
This question has been viewed 731 times.
Last activity .
Tips for giving the best answers
Sometimes it's just little details that separates a great and not so great answer! Here are a few simple tips to keep in mind:
- 1
- Be complete and thorough. Don't skimp on the details!
- 2
- Try not to answer with a question. Because that's not really an answer, right?
- 3
- A little research goes a long way. Back up your claims and assumptions!
- 4
- Try to be patient, tech questions can be complicated.
- 5
- You are awesome for both reading this and answering questions.
