write a review

user reviews (3)

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
8.0
avg rating
worse better
Criteria awful
poor
so-so
good
great Average

Image quality

1 rating

0
 
0
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
8.0

Video quality

1 rating

0
 
0
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
8.0

Battery life

1 rating | 1 comment

1
 
0
 
0
 
0
 
0
 
2.0

Design and form factor

1 rating | 1 comment

0
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
0
 
6.0

Durability

1 rating

0
 
0
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
8.0

Speed (start-up time, lag)

1 rating

0
 
0
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
8.0

Ease of use

1 rating | 1 comment

0
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
0
 
6.0
8.0
rating
ragfield
ragfield

reviewed on Jul 30, 2009

http://rob.ragfield.com/2009/07/p6000.html Let's start with the pros. The P6000 is smaller and more portable than my than my DSLR, so I was able to take it with me more often than the 50D. The quality of photos is excellent. It's not DSLR quality, but it's better than any other point... Read the full review →

0 people find this review helpful

7.0
rating
CyberBiker
CyberBiker

reviewed on May 19, 2011

good Image quality good Video quality good Durability good Speed (start-up time, lag) so-so Design and form factor so-so Ease of use awful! Battery life
I bought this because of the GPS capability, but that function eats the batteries so fast that the camera became hard to depend on since the battery went dead after a day or so, even with the GPS off. If I didn't keep the battery either out of the camera or kept an extra fully charged battery... Read the full review →

0 people find this review helpful

8.0
rating
MrEricM
MrEricM

reviewed on Aug 9, 2009

Previous to this camera I had a Nikon D60. A nice camera, but I found the lenses to be too much and it was a bit much to carry around with the body, lenses, etc. I eventually settled on this (The P6000) and so far have been satisfied with it. Things I like: -The GPS is really nice. As mentioned, you... Read the full review →

0 people find this review helpful