Discussion about
marc

Can the IOC tell athletes which headphones to wear?

After a number of high-profile athletes have been caught on-camera wearing headphones from brands like Beats and Sol Republic (favored by swimmer Michael Phelps), the International Olympic Committee has apparently begun cracking down on athletes who wear gear that isn't provided by official sponsors. According to one report:

Now, British Olympic Association spokesperson Darryl Siebel has said that officials have reminded team leaders of "the importance of protecting our corporate partners" and pointed out that rules are in place that prevent competitors from promoting commercial products and brands during the Olympic Games.

The International Olympic Committee has a rule, rule 40, which allows organisers to disqualify competitors who promote their own sponsors, either on the field of play or online. It is believed that the field of play also includes the area behind starting blocks in the Aquatics Centre, for example.


Will the IOC be able to enforce the ban? I'm a little dubious. After all, would the IOC actually disqualify Phelps -- who holds the record for most medals ever won by a single Olympian -- for wearing Sols instead of Panasonics (the official sponsor) -- especially given that Phelps isn't being paid by Sol to wear their headphones? And after checking NBC's feed this morning, it's clear that at least some athletes are still wearing Beats.


So, for now, at least, it's on, and the IOC may be forced to either stay quiet, or actually start kicking out decorated athletes because they insist on wearing their own headphones when they're getting ready for their events.

www.pocket­-lint.com­/news­/46787­/olympics­-athletes­-b...

sort by

5 replies
TgD

It is pretty ludicrous. McDonalds is a major sponsor of the olympics and you don't see them forcing Big Macs down the athletes' throats.

If Panasonic wanted to sponsor a particular athlete, that is one thing. There would be a contract and then they would abide by that,

Honestly, I have ranted offline about how commercial the olympics have become and how it defeats the spirit of the games set by the Greeks in the beginning. Not a rant for gdgt, but this further drives home that point.

3 like dislike
oliseo

It really annoys me just how much power the "official" sponsors have with regards to how little money they have spent.

Less than 1% of the funding for the Olympics came from the "official sponsors". Yet they feel they can tell everyone, participants and spectators alike what to drink, what to wear, what to eat.

What a load of bollocks. We should all boycott their companies for being arrogant c**nts.
2 like dislike

This post has been removed.

baileylo

More ridiculous than telling athletes which head phones they can wear is telling the athletes what condoms to use. But apparently that has happened as well: www.npr.org­/blogs­/thetorch­/2012­/08­/08­/158416801­/ro....

On the other hand if I paid the IOC millions of dollars to use my product and then I saw people weren't wearing my product I'd be peeved.
0 like dislike
DaveBinM

If they're purely wearing it as a sponsorship deal for themselves at the Olympics, and it competes against a sponsor of the Olympics, I could see them being annoyed, but you can't disqualify someone for that. Are they going to dictate which brand of shoes the runners can wear, so that it lines up with their sponsors? Different shoes suit different people. It's a bit ridiculous.
0 like dislike
JohnCrawford

The Olympics, like any other scripted reality TV show, survives on sponsors and product placement. How dare these athletes go off script and bring unauthorized items onto the set? Honestly, have they no shame?

I jest.
0 like dislike