If you are willing to pay twice as much and if the size and weight won't bother you, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM is the better lens. Likewise, if you refuse to carry a tripod, then the 16-35mm is the better choice. Either lens wipes the floor with any of the sub-35mm prime lenses from...
Read the full review →90-Day Price History
Critic reviews
sort by
We don't have any critic reviews for the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM yet. Are we missing some? Let us know!
You can also add the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM to your gdgt Want List and we'll send you an email when there are new critic reviews!
How it stacks up
Instantly compare the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM side by side with some of the top devices on gdgt!
Compare theseOther Canon camera lenses
-
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM from $349 -
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM from $2199 -
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II from $110 -
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM from $1149 -
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM from $1499
Don't forget to check out these other devices by Canon, you might find something good!